First of all, from the perspective of influence, the successful entry of Huawei Polar reflects the further establishment of Huawei's influence in 3GPP. To know that coding can be regarded as the core technology of air interface, if you get it, it will have the core influence (afterwards, it is a weight of speech).
Looking back at the beginning of 3G and 4G, Huawei is just a follower. It is not easy to get to this position today. Regardless of whether Polar has an absolute advantage in technology, it is politically obstructed by Europe and the United States. Why are Europe and the United States (mainly the United States) so opposed to Polar? Please see the play of the tech spider column mentioned above.
Let's talk about the technical performance. The quality of the code directly affects the performance of the system. In actual bidding, the operator sees performance. Since the encoding is written into the standard, the technology that ultimately distinguishes the performance is the decoding algorithm of the major equipment vendors.
For Polar, compared to Huawei's other major European and American base station equipment vendors (Ericsson, Nokia) and terminal equipment vendors (Samsung, Qualcomm, etc.), the accumulation of Polar in the past few years is almost zero. So once Polar is written into the standard, they are basically lost on the starting line.
Note: This is actually not a patent issue. The patent is on the one hand, and more importantly, the performance of the product you provide (after all, these equipment vendors are products, not simple patent companies).
Therefore, the success of Polar this time not only makes Huawei (in fact, not only Huawei, but also those Chinese companies that support Huawei, ZTE, MediaTek, Datang...) have increased their influence and are more likely to make future communication market share. Reshuffle.
Silicone Braided Wire,Rubber Braided Wire,Wire Soft Core,Insulated Braided Wire
JIANGSU PENGSHEN HIGH TEMPERATURE WIRE CABLE CO., LTD. , https://www.pengshencable.com