If the high-speed PCB design can be as simple as connecting the schematic nodes and as beautiful as seen on a computer monitor, that would be a wonderful thing. However, unless the designer first enters the PCB design, or is extremely fortunate, the actual PCB design is usually not as easy as the circuit design they are engaged in. PCB designers face many new challenges before the design finally works and some people affirm performance. This is the current state of high-speed PCB design – design rules and design guidelines are constantly evolving, and if they are lucky, they will form a successful solution.
The vast majority of PCBs are schematic designers who are proficient in the workings and interactions of PCB devices and the various data transmission standards that make up the input and output of the board, and may or may not know little about the schematic. The result of the cooperation between professional layout designers after the connection is converted into printed circuit copper wire. Often, the master of the board is responsible for the success or failure of the final board. However, the more schematic designers know about good layout techniques, the more opportunities there are to avoid major problems.
If your design contains high-density FPGAs, there are likely to be many challenges placed in front of well-designed schematics. Including hundreds of input and output ports, operating frequencies exceeding 500MHz (which may be higher in some designs), and solder ball pitches as small as half a millimeter, etc., which will result in undue design between the units The mutual influence.
Concurrent Switching Noise The first challenge is probably the so-called concurrent switching noise (SSN) or concurrent switching output (SSO). A large amount of high-frequency data streams will cause problems such as ringing and crosstalk on the data lines, and ground bounce and power supply noise problems that affect the performance of the entire board at power and ground planes.
In order to solve ringing and crosstalk on high-speed data lines, switching to differential signals is a good first step. Since one line on the differential pair is the sink terminal and the other provides the source current, the inductive effect can be fundamentally eliminated. When data is transmitted using a differential pair, it helps to reduce the "bounce" noise generated by the induced current in the return path because the current remains locally. For RF up to hundreds of MHz or even several GHz, the signal theory shows that the maximum signal power can be transmitted during impedance matching. When the transmission line is not well matched, a reflection will occur, and only a part of the signal will be transmitted from the originating end to the receiving device, while other parts will bounce back and forth between the transmitting end and the receiving end. The quality of the differential signal on the PCB will play a large role in impedance matching (and other aspects).
Differential Trace Design The differential trace design is based on the principle of impedance controlled PCB. The model is a bit like a coaxial cable. On an impedance controlled PCB, the metal planar layer can be used as a shield, the insulator is an FR4 laminate, and the conductor is a signal trace pair (see Figure 1). The average dielectric constant of FR4 is between 4.2 and 4.5. Since the manufacturing error is not known, it may cause excessive etching of the copper wire, eventually causing an impedance error. The most accurate way to calculate the trace impedance of a PCB is to use a field parser (usually two-dimensional, sometimes three-dimensional), which requires finite element method to directly solve Maxwell's equations for the entire PCB batch. The software analyzes EMI effects based on trace spacing, line width, line thickness, and the height of the insulation.
The 100Ω characteristic impedance has become the industry standard for differential connections. A 100Ω differential line can be made with two 50Ω single-ended lines of equal length. Since the two traces are close to each other, the field coupling between the lines will reduce the differential mode impedance of the line. In order to maintain the impedance of 100Ω, the width of the trace must be reduced a little. As a result, the common mode impedance of each of the 100Ω differential pairs will be slightly higher than 50 ohms.
Theoretically, the size of the traces and the materials used determine the impedance, but vias, connectors, and even device pads will introduce impedance discontinuities in the signal path. It is usually impossible to use these things. Sometimes, for more reasonable layout and routing, you need to increase the number of layers of the PCB, or add functions like buried holes. The buried hole only connects part of the PCB, but it also increases the manufacturing cost of the board while solving the problem of the transmission line. But sometimes there is no choice at all. As signal speeds get faster and space gets smaller, additional demands such as buried vias begin to increase, which should be a cost factor for PCB solutions.
When stripline wiring is used, the signal is sandwiched by the FR-4 material. In the case of a microstrip line, a conductor is exposed to the air. Because air has the lowest dielectric constant (Er = 1), the top layer is best suited for routing critical signals such as clock signals or high frequency Serial-Deserial (SERDES) signals. The microstrip line wiring should be coupled to a ground plane that reduces electromagnetic interference (EMI) by absorbing a portion of the electromagnetic field lines. In the stripline, all of the electromagnetic field lines are coupled to the upper and lower reference planes, which greatly reduces EMI.
If possible, try not to use a wide-edge coupled stripline design. This structure is susceptible to the differential noise coupled in the reference plane. There is also a need for balanced manufacturing of PCBs, which is difficult to control. In general, it is still relatively easy to control the line spacing on the same layer.
Decoupling and Bypass Capacitors Another important aspect of determining the actual performance of the PCB is that it needs to be controlled by adding decoupling and bypass capacitors. Adding decoupling capacitors helps reduce the inductance between the PCB's power supply and ground plane and helps control the signal and IC impedance across the PCB. The bypass capacitor helps provide a clean power supply to the FPGA (providing a charge bank). The traditional rule is to place decoupling capacitors anywhere convenient for PCB routing, and the number of FPGA power pins determines the number of decoupling capacitors. However, the ultra-high switching speed of FPGAs completely breaks this stereotype.
In a typical FPGA board design, the capacitor closest to the power supply provides frequency compensation for the current change of the load. To provide low frequency filtering and to prevent the supply voltage from dropping, use large decoupling capacitors. The voltage drop is due to the lag of the regulator's response when the design circuit starts. This large capacitance is usually an electrolytic capacitor with a good low frequency response, and its frequency response ranges from DC to several hundred kHz.
Each FPGA output change requires charging and discharging the signal line, which requires energy. The function of the bypass capacitor is to provide local energy storage over a wide frequency range. In addition, a small capacitor with a small series inductance is required to provide high-speed current for high-frequency transients. The large capacitor with slow response continues to supply current after the high frequency capacitor energy is consumed. The large number of current transients on the power bus increases the complexity of the FPGA design. This current transient is usually related to SSO/SSN. Capacitors with very small inductors will provide local high frequency energy that can be used to eliminate switching current noise on the power bus.
This decoupling capacitor that prevents high frequency current from entering the device supply must be very close to the FPGA (less than 1 cm). Many small capacitors are sometimes connected in parallel as a local energy storage for the device and respond quickly to changes in current demand.
In general, the wiring of the decoupling capacitors should be absolutely short, including the vertical distance in the vias. Even adding a little bit increases the inductance of the wire, which reduces the effect of decoupling.
Other technologies As signal speeds increase, it becomes increasingly difficult to easily transfer data on a board. Other techniques can be utilized to further enhance the performance of the PCB.
The first and most obvious method is the simple device layout. It is common sense to design the shortest and most direct path for the most critical connections, but don't underestimate this. Since the simplest strategy can get the best results, why bother to adjust the signal on the board?
Almost the same simple method is to consider the width of the signal line. When the data rate is as high as 622MHz or higher, the skin effect of signal transmission becomes more prominent. When the distance is long, very thin traces on the PCB (such as 4 or 5 mils) will cause a large attenuation of the signal, just like an undesigned low-pass filter with attenuation, with attenuation The frequency increases and increases. The longer the backplane, the higher the frequency and the wider the width of the signal line. For backplane traces longer than 20 inches, the line width should be 10 or 12 mils.
Usually, the most critical signal on the board is the clock signal. When the clock line is designed too long or not good, it will amplify the jitter and offset for the downstream, especially when the speed increases. Multiple layers should be avoided to transfer clocks, and there should be no vias on the clock line because the vias will increase impedance variations and reflections. If the inner layer must be used to route the clock, then the upper and lower layers should use the ground plane to reduce the delay. When the design uses an FPGA PLL, noise on the power plane increases PLL jitter. If this is critical, a “power island†can be created for the PLL that uses a thicker etch in the metal plane to isolate the PLL analog supply from the digital supply.
For signals that exceed 2Gbps, a more costly solution must be considered. At such high frequencies, backplane thickness and via design have a large impact on signal integrity. The effect is better when the thickness of the backing plate does not exceed 0.200 inches. When the high-speed signal on the PCB, the number of layers should be as small as possible, which can limit the number of vias. In thick plates, the vias that connect the signal layers are long and will form a transmission line branch on the signal path. Buried holes can solve this problem, but the manufacturing cost is high. Another option is to use low-loss dielectric materials such as Rogers 4350, GETEK or ARLON. These materials may nearly double the cost of FR4 materials, but sometimes this is the only option.
There are other design techniques for FPGAs that offer some choice of I/O locations. In critical high-speed SERDES designs, SERDES I/O can be isolated by leaving (but not using) adjacent I/O pins. For example, relative to SERDES Rx and Tx, VCCRX# and VCCTX#, and ball position, 3&TImes;3 or 5&TImes;5 BGA sphere regions can be reserved. Or, if possible, keep the entire I/O group close to the SERDES. If there are no I/O limitations in the design, these technologies can bring benefits without increasing costs.
Finally, and one of the best ways is to refer to the reference board provided by the FPGA manufacturer. Most manufacturers will provide source layout information for the reference board, although special requests may be required due to private information issues. These boards typically contain standard high-speed I/O interfaces because FPGA manufacturers need to use these interfaces when characterizing and authenticating their devices. Keep in mind, however, that these boards are often designed for a variety of uses and do not necessarily match the specific design requirements. Even so, they can still serve as a starting point for creating solutions.
Summary of this article Of course, this article only talks about some basic concepts. Any topic covered here can be discussed in the entire book. The key is to figure out what the goal is before investing a lot of time and effort into PCB layout design. Once the layout is complete, redesigning will take a lot of time and money, even with a slight adjustment to the width of the trace. You can't rely on PCB layout engineers to make designs that meet your actual needs. The schematic designer must always provide guidance, make savvy choices, and take responsibility for the success of the solution.
Basic Features
1. The terminal has universal mounting feet so that it can be installed on U-rail NC 35 and G-rail NC32.
2. The closed screw guide hole ensures ideal screwdriver operation.
3. Equipped with uniform accessories for terminals of multiple cross-section grades, such as end plates, grouping partitions, etc.
4. Potential distribution can be achieved by inserting a fixed bridge in the center of the terminal or an edge-plug bridge inserted into the wire cavity.
5. The grounding terminal and the N-line slider breaking terminal with the same shape as the common terminal.
6. Using the identification system ZT, unified terminal identification can be realized.
7. The rich graphics enhance the three-dimensional sense of the wiring system.
Din Rail Terminal Block,Din Rail Fuse Terminal Block,Din Rail Busbar Terminal Block,Din Rail Power Terminal Blocks
Sichuan Xinlian electronic science and technology Company , https://www.sztmlchs.com