Mudu Jinsheng talks about JVC FX800

This FX800 has been in hand for nearly two weeks, but even if you listen to it, it is not enough for 200 hours. It is definitely not comprehensive and thoughtful with the "evaluation" standard, so just talk about personal feelings. There are flaws in them. Although they strive to be objective, they must have their own subjective elements. If there are biases, please criticize them.

For the JVC brand, many of my friends feel that they are not warm, and more are still well-known in the field of civilian-grade video and audio. And its headset product line, although the year-to-year ranking in the Japanese sales list, but the domestic awareness is relatively low. Because of its technically innovative attempts, various novelty, avant-garde and even strange ideas have emerged endlessly, and many friends have dubbed them “outside technology”: including carbon fiber diaphragms (FXC51, etc.), two units (FXT90) and even new ones. The three-unit micro-motion coil (FXZ200) and Other models. It’s a bit far, but this time I’m talking about the FX800, which is a wonderful example of JVC’s series of bold attempts...~The first time I saw the news of this model, it was indeed “wood diaphragm + wooden cavity” The combination is attracted, and I can't help but feel that JVC dares to do it again... Wood diaphragm is rare in application, and the impression is more used in speaker products (and it seems that JVC is still in use? To be tested) It's really curious in earplugs, but in fact this technology has already been used by JVC in the predecessor FX700 and even earlier FX500.

Gossip a lot, go back to the topic. This time, the protagonist FX800, from the appearance, the material is solid, exquisite workmanship, no matter from the selection of wood cavity, and the processing of metal parts, we can see the Japanese brand's consistent pursuit of details. Individuals don't have a particular preference for wood products, but they don't say that the fans of Tianlong and Tiejia have a lot of fans. Even if the shell selection of the colorful C4 is a reason for some users to choose it, the wood cavity of FX800 can be seen. No doubt it will be one of the selling points. I don't have much research on wood. From the perspective of the layman, the FX800 is more eye-catching regardless of texture or surface treatment. If you continue to discuss only the appearance, it is inevitable that there will be a vase, so the following is still combined with some personal experience. The cavity of the FX800 is an open design with a large tuning hole and is protected by a metal mesh. Despite the high degree of openness, the actual level of sound insulation can still reach an average level. And the presence of the tuning hole did not cause obvious wind noise problems. From the personal experience, even the outdoor riding will not cause obvious trouble to the listening. Although the specific line base and parameters are unknown, from the point of view of workmanship, the wire selection of this work can be said to be more conscience, soft and comfortable to wear, and it has excellent suppression of the stethoscope effect (I think this seems subtle but But it can't be ignored, the bad stethoscope effect is a nightmare for the experience of an earplug product. It doesn't need to be equipped with an ear hook for the ear, and the metal shield is also beautiful with a transparent plastic tube. Exquisite, but I don't know if the surface friction will be used after a long time. The metal and rubber structure of the cavity at the junction of the cavity re-emerges the intention. The diameter of the sounding duct is relatively thick, which is probably related to the selected 10mm unit. There is a fiber cotton filter at the exit. I don't know if it will be necessary and difficult to replace it after a long time. In any case, from the perspective of appearance, design and workmanship, FX800 personally believes that it can definitely stand the flagship level.

However, as a headset, the focus is still to return to the sound. Due to equipment conditions and listening taste, the following is just a personal feeling, for your reference only. Overall, the FX800 is relatively easy to drive. Even the Kenwood E8's weak PO port can easily achieve sufficient sound pressure, and even under the onboard sound card, the noise floor is not obvious. The general statement that JVC headphones are generally slower is still relatively common, probably related to special diaphragm materials? This is really incapable of testing, but after 4 or 50 hours of listening, the whole is indeed more stretched, and it is still time to test whether the subsequent changes are obvious. The sound of the FX800 is briefly summarized as being warmer and thicker. It tends to be more enthusiastic, more honest than calm and refined, but it is more intense than the UM3X. In general, energy, fullness, fullness of elasticity, strong air, guitar and other stringed instruments are very impressive for the first ear, but the overall lack of a loose, some friends may look a bit rich Aggressive. Analytical aspects are above the average level of dynamic earplugs, but in combination with the moving iron model, there is still a certain gap between the details of the small four (should be in order to balance the sense of music?), friends with special requirements Need to pay attention. The details and the amount of information are up to the standard but not stunning, but it will not be as deliberately emphasized or even exaggerated as the tf10 and other models, but it seems too chilly or even artificial. The sound field is moderately sized. After all, it is an open design. It is basically the level of the normal flagship dynamic earplugs, but it is not very wide. For those who love the sound field, they may even feel a bit stuffy. The pinpoint on this point should be The manufacturer deliberately, after all, many consumers are more enamored with the sensation of the vocal, the sound field shape is relatively regular, although the positioning is not top, but the three-dimensional feeling is good, the overall atmosphere is still relatively in place. In terms of tri-band, FX800 should not be balanced according to personal standards. On the whole, it is relatively downward-distributed. It is slightly pyramid-shaped. If you do not make an appropriate analogy, give me some feeling similar to ie8, but The sense of line is slightly inferior. The low-frequency sense is quite sufficient, but it is still not booming. It is full of elasticity and good texture without divergence. Some of the low-frequency knobs are adjusted to the penultimate grid of IE8 (呃, that is, the degree of distortion is not yet). The potential is good but there is room for improvement. The overall situation is magnificent, but for users with fresh tastes, it should be biased. The intermediate frequency is moderate, and the overall is still neutral. The vocals are not far away, and they are relatively plain and unstained. On the positive side, they can be restored to a better degree. On the negative side, some friends may feel a little less, although they are relatively incomprehensible. However, the visual inspection is still in line with most users' tastes. In terms of high frequency, it is not clear, not glamorous, but it is quite high. If the front-end control is insufficient, it may even be slightly scratched. However, it may be more appropriate for a friend who likes to feel more irritating.

In terms of adapting to the style of music, the FX800 is not as white as the first impression that its appearance gives me. Most popular vocals can still be better interpreted, and the individual hears less, but I feel that this tendency to restore is supposed to be It's not too close to the poison, and it's a bit less refined in some fresh styles. Jazz and reggae are good enough to listen to, because of its warm and flexible style, it can show a good atmosphere, pan-rock performance is enough surprise, or more instrumental points, guitar lively and vivid The drums are calm and powerful, and the piano is passionate, but the low frequency of each paragraph is slightly overwhelming. See also the previous reasons, small room music, New Age and OST are satisfactory. Speaking of the short board, it is probably not very good at compiling classical music. Although the metal brilliance of the copper tube is not enough, the instrumental interpretation of each part is still satisfactory, but overall Lack of a trace of harmony, seemingly unable to control the scene, the sound field is more crowded.

In summary, the FX800 is still a relatively successful positioning model, its elegant appearance and exquisite workmanship, even for the non-burning group should have a small attraction, and itself can be seen from the wearing comfort and other aspects The intention of the manufacturer. Although it is not difficult to drive, it seems to have certain requirements for the front-end control ability. In terms of sound, the warmth is too thick, and the hard quality meets the standard without neglecting the sense of music. The sound field is regular and the three-dimensional feeling is very good, but it cannot be called particularly transparent. The tri-band distribution has its own characteristics, and individuals believe that it is not balanced. The lower part is calm, the energy is sufficient, and the low-frequency part which is full of elasticity is most impressive. The intermediate frequency is partially restored, and the middle part is moderate; the high-frequency part is high and slightly stimulated. Although the style is not versatile, but the overall is still omnivorous, instrumental performance is better than the vocal part, if it is just to find a popular vocal plug, then it may not be appropriate, but most of the music types except the large classical Can be better interpreted. Finally, I personally think that the price of the 2980 may appear to be higher (if it is not very concerned about the appearance and work), but given the price of the event before, I would like to see the right time for my favorite friends. .