In the second decade of the new century, the fruits of the domestic high-precision technology industry are not constantly emerging. Many of the achievements that our fathers did not dare to think of have been realized one by one. This is not only the result of the continuous progress of scientific researchers, but also the entire country’s society. The ability to integrate capabilities and improve overall capabilities. Not long ago, the successful launch of the domestically produced "big plane" (Trunk Airliner) C919 was a real example of this scene.
The progress of China's industries in the 21st century is multi-dimensional. Not all industries can quickly gain the understanding and support of most public opinion. Just like the aforementioned C919, before the first flight, it has been in a strong controversy. Similarly, the public opinion voice of the domestic general-purpose processor industry is also very noisy and even faces a more chaotic situation. We want to briefly review some of the paradoxes of domestic CPU today.
The application areas of domestic CPUs cover not only specialized fields such as embedded devices and server devices, but also consumer-level civilian markets. Due to the huge differences between the service objects and the application areas, the presence of different types of domestic CPUs in the "hearts" of the Chinese people is far from the same. For instance, it is specifically aimed at servers such as Feiteng and Shenwei. It is not obscure, and it is rarely reported to the press. For this kind of CPU brand that aims to serve professional fields and even have military qualifications, the ordinary Chinese people are not concerned, and they themselves have a considerable distance from the general public, and they should also be so.
The truly familiar brands are not only satisfied with the professional field, but are designed to win players in the consumer market. For example, Godson, who we have seen in the news for more than ten years, is a Typical.
The biggest feature of the consumer market is that the importance of visibility and historical inertia has always been higher than the advanced or functional nature of a single product technology, because this is a fully nurtured market, and an obscure product can never fly. Therefore, in order to let the public understand the value of their existence, each domestic CPU brand has no choice but to compare with the well-known brands in the industry.
We have seen time and time again that various kinds of news describing domestic CPUs can, under certain conditions, catch up with Intel or AMD's technological level, and even have been numb to this, which is a direct manifestation of this obligatory factor. This kind of subjectively blameless, objectively bringing about the "climbing" effect of propaganda not only cultivates a large number of domestic users of CPU fans dedicated to the "totem" in their own hearts, but also creates a sense of alienation between the domestic environment and the CPU. Distrust.
Here is Fritz Chess chess, everyone should be familiar with, the software supports multi-threading, so ZX-C+, ZX-D quad-core processor performance can also be, 8-core 3GHz ZX-E (this is 16nm process , probably still in tapeout stage, and did not release it), performance is similar to the Skylake architecture Core i5-6600.
It is particularly saddening that these domestic CPU fans are not only "spurt" of neutral crowds who might have been able to understand the domestic "core", but also attacked themselves and accused each other of the CPU brands they support are not "independent". Comprador, scam or cancer. This phenomenon is painful and painful. It is a sigh.
Respect for doing practical application
The sign of human social and technological progress has always been closely related to the social division of labor. It is the separation of handicrafts and agriculture that has led to the emergence of urban settlements and the birth of civilization at national and historical levels. For thousands of years, along with the advancement of material civilization, it has always been the subdivision of production and consumption, and the refinement of education.
In today's highly socialized division of labor, anyone has limited knowledge of the scientific and technological achievements outside of the segments they are directly engaged in. The author once interviewed Dr. Song Jiqiang, President of the Intel China Research Institute. During the interview, Dr. Song was an artificial intelligence expert. In the introduction of the basic concepts and boundaries of artificial intelligence, he always emphasized the premise that he was not a brain science expert. Only from the side of artificial intelligence to understand related concepts.
Artificial intelligence uses the CPU, which is directly related to our current CPU topic. As Dr. Song emphasized, no matter whether it is the general public or the academies of space, as long as it is not the core personnel of the top IC design team, the knowledge of CPUs, such as sophisticated products, is relatively limited. Maybe some people can obtain from the industry level. More information, but in the current era of interlacing, we do not need, and it is impossible to judge and screen any national CPU for a referendum.
Whether or not a certain domestic CPU can persist in the future that can be met and obtain vitality that is prosperous and long-lasting depends on whether or not he can form a self-sufficient industrial ecology. There is no inevitable logical relationship even if he is advanced and the function is perfect. Whether or not "autonomy" is a totally empty topic. Why do we have to "autonomy"? In different industries, there are different specific answers. As far as China is concerned, there are probably three reasons.
First, China’s world status determines that China needs to maintain a relatively complete industrial chain to improve the overall competitiveness of the society. Second, China’s defense needs determine that most industries must have a certain degree of independent participation; Third, China’s economic development needs more robust growth and drives overall social progress.
The “IC†industry is a core area in the IT industry and to some extent represents the future development direction of the information society. Therefore, from any perspective, the Chinese should support the development of the domestic chip industry, especially the “CPU†industry, regardless. For some reason, some of the viewpoints that have cherished certain defamatory and attacking China's "CPU" without a future are not mature performances of mature individuals.
However, supporting "autonomy" does not mean that you must retrospect "descent." Market-for-technology is one of the important sources of technological progress in modern China. Almost all mainstream domestic “CPUs†have foreign factors. The only difference lies in the difference between the level of “authorization†and controllability in the subsequent development. At least, the common domestic CPU brands such as "Godson", "Siucore", "Shenwei" and "Fengteng" that have attracted people's attention are all the same. The only difference is the issue of authorization at some level of detail.
For ordinary electronic product enthusiasts, the relevant national defense security departments consider and review them. If they are not classified units, they face any foreign brands that may come into contact with them, such as Intel. There is no essential difference. It is a high-tech commodity that is in circulation. What ordinary people need to consider is whether this processor and the corresponding ecology can meet the needs of their lives and work, and how they compare with their competitors.
Concerned about the actual results, care about the application level is not easy to use, it is the real focus of public opinion. For those domestic CPU brands that aim to open the consumer market and achieve overall industry progress, this is also a problem that they need to solve. Even in the highly mature desktop X86 architecture field, only rigorous final output, such as game testing and video transcoding testing, can truly meet consumers and let them understand the advantages and disadvantages of the products. The tall slogan has no real value. It will even develop the same rebellious mentality as "the wolf has come."
Ecology is looking forward to the future
In human history, there have been many attempts to artificially create self-circulating biological systems. The famous “Biosphere 2†in Arizona in the United States was eventually declared to have failed in 1993, and this effort has been greatly frustrated. However, since space exploration will not stop, human research on the atmospheric environment and geophysical environment will not stop. Such positive attempts will continue.
The failure of the Biosphere 2 has fundamentally proved the complexity and difficulty of establishing a highly chaotic multi-dimensional self-circulatory system out of thin air. His greatest revelation is that most of the human activities to date have been collective. Successful people have all the advantages to weaken their risks. - At the unsuitable time, it may be difficult or courageous, but the most positive outcome is only to accumulate experience for later generations. Looking at the situation, facing up to the existing conditions, actively exploring favorable factors is the key to the success of most system engineering and commercial projects.
For the chip industry, this existing condition is mainly a hardware and software environment similar to the biosphere. Intel’s recent interest in efforts to build an ecosystem of emerging IT markets on a large number of occasions is proof. Historically, there have been numerous projects due to disappointing results.
The largest CPU manufacturer Intel himself recently announced the cooperation with Hewlett-Packard Itanium processor's new "poor" shipping plan, the existent An Itan dying; when Microsoft attempted to use Tegra to build pure ARM Windows ecosystem, the Surface RT was born for this The corpse of the "domestic independent intellectual property rights" version of Linux that has sprung up all over the country has shook loudly, and most of them are now obliterated.
The greatest value of domestic CPUs lies in the fact that they can survive on their own, and only self-sufficiency can develop them. Judging from the status quo, domestically produced processors in the “unpopular†sector outside the mainstream consumer sector have made considerable progress and are now facing the threshold from survival to growth.
On the whole, the most basic requirement of “producing foreigners with skills to combat foreigners†has been achieved. In areas where government, education, and defense embedded systems do not require absolute processor performance, Godson , Siu-core processor has a firm footing, available for use. Some areas that emphasize energy consumption ratios, such as the mobile market and some areas where the ARM architecture dominates, have made domestic CPUs a late starter and a late starter, and can even be said to be developing well.
In the field of super-large-scale supercomputers, China’s engineering personnel have played a powerful integration capability, and have produced the world’s top engineering miracles such as “Tianhe†and “Light of the Taihu Lakeâ€. In these areas of healthy momentum of development, the key to domestic CPU development is to avoid the most devastating ecological construction and to avoid the consumer market where competitors can't shake their comparative advantage for several decades.
So, we must permanently give up the hottest CPU area? When the world is different, from the perspective of ordinary people, the vision is to look ahead. The multimedia information platforms of the modern information society have so far only been about 100 years old. Television was invented between the two world wars. By 1964, the Tokyo Olympics achieved a global live broadcast. Global has been a dream come true in a generation.
In the rapidly developing electronics industry, anything can happen. In today’s domestic market, let’s not say that no one in the early days of TV service providers who had already gone by the wind knew that Japanese television, which was once unpredictable, has also been declining.
In front of the time, in the face of constantly updating technology, the probability of a pre-foundation study and the chance of passing over a curve is not low. However, on the desktop and server platforms, the existing ecological environment represented by the X86 architecture is indeed deep-rooted. Whether it is to start another fight against him (such as Godson) or actively integrate with him to grow up (such as Zhaoxin), it will not be able to form itself in the short term. The comparative advantage.
It is not shameful to admit that the temporary disadvantage is that the X86 really has a stable period of less than 30 years. For the real practitioners in the country, whether or not you are their fan, there is more tolerant expectation and less practicality. The "criticism" is the right move to provide better social support, especially public opinion support.
Our banknote handling machines mainly include following
BC -30: basic piece counter with only one UV
BC-35: piece counter with UV MG
BC-40: value counter with one CIS, support 4 currencies, Auto recognition, multi-currency mix counting
BC-55: value counter with two CIS, support 40 currencies at the same time, serial number reading, Auto recognition, multi-currency mix counting, remote software upgrading via network
Those 4 models have similar structure, passage can be opened from reat side, easy for maintenance and cleaning
BCS-160: 1+1 pockets banknote sorter with two CIS, support 20 currencies at most, serial number reading
Euro Banknote Sorter,1+1 Pockets Banknote Sorter,Two Pockets Banknote Sorter,Banknote Sorter
Suzhou Ribao Technology Co. Ltd. , https://www.ribaoeurope.com