Once Meizu had a very glamorous time, when Android had just emerged, most of the domestic mobile phones were still MTK programs. Meizu M8 turned out to be amazing. I was circulated by Meizu at that time.
So this time to a friend to buy a gift, less than 2,000 price, I did not think too much to buy MX6 to him, after all, I like to play mobile phones, so apart from anything else to advance to him unpacking ha ha ha ha ha ha. As the saying goes today, monkey buying, MX6 is basically difficult to buy. There is ample supply of Meizu counters throughout the country. Jingdong and Meizu's official website also do not need to make an appointment to buy. I bought it offline, so post a Jingdong link:
I said before the original one plus one: Do not increase the price Do not buy the phone is a good phone. This time Meizu MX6 has done this, then simply share the experience to see if you can call it a good phone.
Note: This article will not discuss performance, cost performance. It starts with the main appeal of the mobile phone. I hope friends with a cost-effective approach can close the top right corner thanks.
Appearance detailsI believe Meizu's friends should be concerned about the appearance of this mx6 is not much expectation, after all, the positive is a family-style design without change, while the back is followed a few months ago Pro6's injection antenna, the overall appearance can be described as Surprise.
Of course, no innovation in appearance does not mean that mx6 does not look good, and the appearance of mx6 is still very good-looking. The front panel design is symmetrical and simple. There are no ugly openings, and the mtouch keys are also very delicate. They are not as loose as the mx5.
The front is covered with a 2.5d glass, the arc is still very obvious, can effectively enhance the use of the feel, and the junction of the glass and the frame is too natural, like the natural extension of the arc.
Whether it is a button, flash groove or the bottom of the hole, mx6 have made a high light cutting, giving a very fine feeling.
Once the Meizu phone slot work has always been a big slot, loose card slot gives a sense of cheap. This time, mx6's overall improvement in workmanship is also reflected in the card slot. The card slot is ejected with a thimble, which feels smooth when ejected, and the card slot is very firm after plug-in, and there is no sense of looseness. Meizu is finally slowly improving in detail work.
On the touch, as a 5.5-inch mobile phone, I think the MX6's feel is not very good. If you have used iphone 6 plus people should feel that 6 plus is too big to support it, mx6 brings in the feel is to support the feeling. The reason for this is because the design language of mx6 is really similar to iphone6 ​​plus, and the borders are relatively rounded. If it is a small size, such a design can bring a better feeling, but at the 5.5-inch level, the already large body plus a rounded frame will change the feeling in the hands. It's even bigger.
On the other hand, when it comes to mellowness, the back curvature of the Meizu Mx6 is no longer the mx3's comfortable back curvature because of the thickness of the fuselage.
Once the MX3 feels surprisingly good, it can be seen from this that the Meizu has gradually given up the excellent feeling that it once pursued in order to pursue a thin appearance. Of course, I'm not talking nonsense either. In the 5.5-inch range, I personally feel that oppo r9 ​​and one plus three have better control than mx6. No wonder JWong will say on Weibo:
And not only is the feel, the metal material on the back has been almost universally used by the Meizu itself. The low-end charm blue e and high-end pro6 are all made of sandblasted metal back cover plus injection molded antenna strip. Although there is a change in the design, the overall feeling at first glance is not much different. In addition, the waist circle key is used by the majority of manufacturers for reference, which also causes the MX6 to be more deficient in its appearance.
(Image from mobile phone China Network)
Do not know Meizu in the next mobile phone design can not be more effort in the diversification of materials (such as glass or ceramic Kevlar).
Just as I finished this article, Meizu released the new low-end U10/U20, which features double-sided glass, but .... is ugly....it's not a matter of material, or design issues.
 To get started with mobile phones, we should still have the most screen contact. A good screen can give people a better experience. Meizu has been promoting the TDDI process when it launched the MX6, but it has not kept its screen materials and suppliers shut. What is currently known is that this screen is definitely not an amoled from Samsung. Checking various data through the Internet should be a LCD screen from Sharp.
Regarding the choice of screen material, I can only say that I personally prefer the aluminous screen's self-illumination characteristics, so when I saw the screen of Meizu, the first thing I noticed was the problem of backlight leakage caused by the LCD screen.
Of course, light leakage is basically an unavoidable problem, and the light leakage of the mx6 is hard to detect, so this issue will not affect its use. However, in terms of color performance, I am accustomed to the amoled screen and I always feel that the mx6's screen has some shortcomings in the color performance. Since there is no professional color calibration equipment, I am here to take a few screen shots.
It can be seen that the screen of mx6 is somewhat blue, which means that the default color temperature is actually cooler. The other color performance is actually pretty good, it is a screen that looks very comfortable. TDDI technology is more to enhance the touch experience, it is almost impossible to detect the advantages of this technology.
However, I must emphasize here that each person's tendency toward color is not the same. As countless people think that a screen is too bright, “for a long time, you have to look at your eyes,†and mx6's screen may in fact match your appetite. The best way is to go to the store and see the screen with your own eyes.
The biggest black spot of the Meizu mobile phone is that the mobile phone signal is not good. Since the baseband has been used for a long time, power consumption is not as good as other mobile phones. Since cooperating with mtk, Meizu should have greatly improved in this respect.
After entering 2016, basically all new smart machines can support dual card full Netcom, Meizu mx6 naturally will not lag behind. The dual card slot adopts the design of dual nano cards. The dual card slots support Unicom Telecom, but it cannot support dual card.
On the signal side, after several days of use. Whether it is in the company or in the underground garage of a suburban shopping mall, the mx6 has always been able to maintain a good signal performance. Of course, there is still no signal from mx6 where no other mobile phone has a signal (such as s7). But at least it shows that Meizu can compete with other vendors in terms of basic communication capabilities.
However, one of the most intuitive consequences of the dual nano slot is that it cannot expand memory. This mx6 only provides a version of 32g, which is undoubtedly a nightmare for those who like to listen to music and watch movies. This point really does not know how Meizu think.
Also note that. Meizu mx6 does not provide nfc function. If the first two years of NFC are not popular, I do not provide this function. However, at the time, the high-profile version of mx3 had nfc functions.... It is puzzling that Meizu does not provide this function when nfc is more and more practical.
Photographing strengthAt the conference of mx6, Bai said that the most common one is probably the imm386 sensor customized with Sony. However, in today's dual-camera popular, unless it is said that moving out of Samsung's exclusive imx260 sensor or other technology outside the black, it is difficult to say that there is something special highlights. So for taking pictures, you still have to rely on photos to speak.
The imaging effect of each photo during the day is similar. The mx6 imaging is very rapid and there has been considerable progress compared to previous generations. The overall color performance is still very good, the color is not too rich, but the blue saturation is still relatively high.
Moreover, in the blue part, sometimes there will be a blue situation. At present, the trigger conditions, I deliberately tried not to try it out, and the blue picture of this picture is actually quite good-looking (forcibly scrubbing)
However, in order to speak of a short board, I think that the performance of mx6 in the dark environment can only be said to be unsatisfactory. Since it was not equipped with optical image stabilization, Meizu chose to improve iso in order to maintain a relatively fast imaging process (1/17s) under automatic transmission. Only in order to denoise, the smear marks on the screen will be very obvious, resulting in missing details.
This is the case for several of the above proofs. At first glance, the brightness of the screen is still quite enough, but it is irresistible to enlarge the view. The details are basically lumped together.
Another problem is Meizu's flash algorithm. First of all, when the flash is turned on to shoot close-ups, overexposure can easily occur.
Second, in the case of dual color temperature flashes that offer higher screen brightness, the mx6's screen resolution is still insufficient. . . This is very embarrassing. . .
Although 1200w pixel imx386 in the 1600w pixel imx298 when the loss of power in the normal analysis, but Meizu this camera in the dark performance is indeed a bit embarrassing. The lack of optical image stabilization makes it necessary to increase the imaging speed in order to improve the filming rate of handheld shooting. However, it can only increase the sensitivity when the quality of the photosensitive elements is invariable, and the software optimization does not keep up with the backward image quality. . It seems to me that Meizu is really necessary to join the optical image stabilization algorithm when the software algorithm suffers.
As for the functional aspects of our daily use, professional models, gif recording, slow motion, hdr and other functions are all a lot. However, software details still need to be strengthened. First of all, talk about the slow-motion mode. Although there may not be many people who use this feature, it still cannot prevent it from becoming a more playable shooting technique. However, the Meizu's slow-motion shooting function is even worse than iphone, s7, etc. First of all, it does not support sound recording, and secondly, it does not provide slow-motion editing options, which means that we cannot freely select our own shots as slow-motion appear. But the most terrible, still in the slow-motion shooting process will appear in the Caton jump frame problem
The above figure shows the problem of Caton frame skipping in slow motion, which greatly affects the shooting effect.
Another point that I am not satisfied with is the unreasonable interaction. Meizu flyme5's photo change has changed the photo mode once sliding, but most of the features are hidden in the button menu.
You have to say that these functions are hidden in the menu, but the commonly used hdr on-off function and night scene noise reduction function are hidden in the secondary menu, which makes it very troublesome to operate.
Speaking of hdr, mx6's camera only hdr open and hdr off two options, and no other mobile phone hdr automatic mode. And when shooting hdr photos, it takes a certain amount of imaging time, reducing the camera experience once.
Experienced down, mx6 camera has hardware regrets and software weaknesses, that Meizu is taking a picture, still have to spend more energy to do it better.
Life performanceThe mobile phone is most valued, it should still be battery life, and even more powerful mobile phone power-off, it is still finished. Mx6 performance in this area is fairly good. Through a five-hour comprehensive use, the mx6 has 25% of the remaining power. Although it seems that the remaining power is not much, the first three hours of this test is basically in a state of high intensity.
In everyday use, even if I use a lot of WeChat at work, I have been playing Weibo for games during the lunch break and mx6 is still strong enough to get me home. In contrast, the Samsung s7 often has been in power at 4 pm.
At the same time Meizu mx6 is also equipped with a fast charge technology called "mcharge". Measured in 40 minutes can be filled with about 65%, it touches the rules, 90 minutes or so full. Charging speed is not much behind the vooc charging speed. The highest heat when charging is also very good control at 40 degrees, unlike Samsung s7 when the temperature is scared to death personally. The overall battery life performance is still satisfactory.
to sum upA simple experience down, mx6 is still a handy mobile phone. There are no obvious shortcomings and no obvious advantages. In the current fierce competition in the mobile phone market, mx6 seems to lack some of the qualities that once belonged to the Meizu mobile phone, the pursuit of unique qualities. Meizu, once a small and beautiful, had to put down some of the things he had insisted on in order to pursue a bigger market. Of course, can also be seen as the mx4mx5 after two generations of confusion, finally found his right direction of development, because the mobile phone work is significantly improved, the power of offline services, Meizu should also blindly see the pursuit of cost-effective The result should be a situation in which manufacturers and consumers are all hurt. The success of oppo and vivo means that good quality, good service, and excellent promotional capabilities can bring more consumers. However, compared with OV Samsung and wealthy Huawei, who have been under the deep-growing line for many years, Meizu is not dominant in these areas, so mx6 is destined to become the Meizu ordinary dream.
Ic Pmic,Pmic Full Half Bridge Drivers,Pmic Gate Drivers,Integrated Circuits Ics Pmic
Shenzhen Kaixuanye Technology Co., Ltd. , https://www.icoilne.com